V. Mathai et al., RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LATERAL INTERNAL SPHINCTEROTOMY WITH HEMORRHOIDECTOMY, British Journal of Surgery, 83(3), 1996, pp. 380-382
A prospective trial was conducted to compare haemorrhoidectomy alone (
control, group 1) with haemorrhoidectomy plus lateral internal sphinct
erotomy (group 2) for prolapsed piles, Some 33 patients (18 men, 15 wo
men) of mean(s.e.m.) age 40(2.3) years were randomized, 16 to group 1
and 17 to group 2, There were no significant differences in postoperat
ive pain scores, Mean resting and maximum anal squeeze pressures, stud
ied 6 weeks and 3 months after operation, were generally lower in grou
p 2, but were not significantly different, Two patients in group 2 wer
e distressed by incontinence to liquid faeces which persisted in one a
fter 1 year, There were no other complications in either group after a
mean(s.e.m.) follow-up of 11(0.4)months. The addition of lateral inte
rnal sphincterotomy to routine haemorrhoidectomy is unnecessary and ca
rries the added risk of incontinence.