QUALITY OF CARE - A COMPARISON OF PREFERENCES BETWEEN MEDICAL SPECIALISTS AND PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC DISEASES

Citation
Mae. Vanderwaal et al., QUALITY OF CARE - A COMPARISON OF PREFERENCES BETWEEN MEDICAL SPECIALISTS AND PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC DISEASES, Social science & medicine, 42(5), 1996, pp. 643-649
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Social Sciences, Biomedical","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
02779536
Volume
42
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
643 - 649
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-9536(1996)42:5<643:QOC-AC>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
In this study, we have looked for differences between medical speciali sts and patients with chronic diseases (COPD, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus)in preferences of aspects of care in relation to th e quality of care. Firstly, to enumerate relevant aspects for chronic diseases, open interviews and a concept mapping were conducted among p atients with a chronic disease, and medical specialists treating them. Here, the respondents have been asked to evaluate statements in relat ion to the quality of care. Secondly, a final questionnaire, including statements on nine relevant aspects of care, was presented to patient s and medical specialists. The response rate among patients was 96% (N = 260) and among medical specialists 67% (N = 340). Both study popula tions ranked 'effectiveness of care' the highest. However, the differe nce in opinion between the two populations was significant, mainly due to the patient's giving a higher ranking to 'continuity of care' and a lower ranking to 'efficiency'. Significant differences were also fou nd between the three patient groups on the aspects 'knowledge' and 'wa iting time for treatment'. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis ranked ' knowledge' higher and 'waiting time for treatment' lower than did the other two patient groups. A lower level of education, having state-reg ulated health insurance and being older were associated with a higher preference for 'continuity'. Between the three groups of the medical s pecialists, no significant differences were found regarding to the pro fession, age and sex. In conclusion: the patients and medical speciali sts researched did not show wide differences of opinion on preferences of care in relation to quality. The only exception to this concerned 'continuity of care' which was ranked higher by patients.