GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE KARAMEA BATHOLITH, NEW-ZEALAND AND COMPARISONS WITH THE LACHLAN FOLD BELT GRANITES OF SE AUSTRALIA

Citation
Rj. Muir et al., GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE KARAMEA BATHOLITH, NEW-ZEALAND AND COMPARISONS WITH THE LACHLAN FOLD BELT GRANITES OF SE AUSTRALIA, Lithos, 39(1-2), 1996, pp. 1-20
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Mineralogy,"Geochemitry & Geophysics
Journal title
LithosACNP
ISSN journal
00244937
Volume
39
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1 - 20
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-4937(1996)39:1-2<1:GOTKBN>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The Karamea Batholith in the Buller terrane of the South Island New Ze aland forms part of an extensive Middle-Late Devonian belt of magmatic activity along, or close to, the Paleo-Pacific margin of Gondwana, Th e belt includes the I- and S-type granites of the Lachlan Fold Belt in SE Australia and coeval rocks in Antarctica. The northern half of the Karamea Batholith comprises five main intrusive phases: Zetland Diori te, Whale Creek Granite, Karamea Granite, O'Sullivans Granite and Dunp hy Granite. To the east of the Karamea Batholith in the Takaka terrane , ultramafic-mafic Devonian igneous rocks are represented by the Riwak a Complex. The rocks forming the Karamea Batholith are a high-K calc-a lkaline suite ranging in composition from metaluminous (ASI for Zetlan d Diorite = 0.8) to strongly peraluminous (ASI for Dunphy Granite = 1. 2-1.3). Initial Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios exhibit a large range from 0.705 in the Zetland Diorite to 0.719 in the Dunphy Granite. The corresponding values for epsilon(Nd) are -0.3 and -9.2. There is a strong inverse c orrelation between epsilon(Nd) and initial Sr-87/Sr-86, which suggests that the Karamea rocks were generated by a simple mixing process. The mafic end-member (with epsilon(Nd) = 0), which is itself probably der ived from a mixed lithospheric source, is taken to be the Zetland Dior ite/Riwaka Complex, and the crustal end-member is represented by Ordov ician Greenland Group greywackes that form the country rocks to the ba tholith. Mixing is also supported by recent U-Pb zircon studies. The i nherited zircon population in the granites matches the detrital zircon population in the Greenland Group greywackes. The Whale Creek Granite , Karamea Granite and O'Sullivans Granite can be modelled by 20-30% cr ustal material, whereas the Dunphy Granite appears to represent 65-85% crustal material. In terms of the I-S classification scheme developed for the Lachlan Fold Belt granites in SE Australia, both types are pr esent in the Karamea Batholith. However, in New Zealand there appears to be a continuum from one extreme to the other, which is consistent w ith the mixing model presented here.