H. Goodglass et al., JUDGMENTS OF CONCEPT SIMILARITY BY NORMAL AND APHASIC SUBJECTS - RELATION TO NAMING AND COMPREHENSION, Brain and language, 56(1), 1997, pp. 138-158
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics","Psychology, Experimental",Neurosciences
A study was conducted in which aphasic patients, age-matched normals,
and normal young adults performed five types of matching judgments for
object pictures. These required matching for physical identity, basic
object identity, and membership in the same superordinate category. S
poken name-to-picture matching was tested for the last two conditions.
An analogous set of conditions was presented for letters. Latency pat
terns across the conditions showed general slowing for the aphasic pat
ients, but with a differential decrement in the conditions that involv
ed auditory (spoken name) input for the matching task. Results showed
that variations in semantic judgment capability among the aphasics did
not predict the patients' object naming ability. (C) 1997 Academic Pr
ess, Inc.