JUDGMENTS OF CONCEPT SIMILARITY BY NORMAL AND APHASIC SUBJECTS - RELATION TO NAMING AND COMPREHENSION

Citation
H. Goodglass et al., JUDGMENTS OF CONCEPT SIMILARITY BY NORMAL AND APHASIC SUBJECTS - RELATION TO NAMING AND COMPREHENSION, Brain and language, 56(1), 1997, pp. 138-158
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics","Psychology, Experimental",Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
0093934X
Volume
56
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
138 - 158
Database
ISI
SICI code
0093-934X(1997)56:1<138:JOCSBN>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
A study was conducted in which aphasic patients, age-matched normals, and normal young adults performed five types of matching judgments for object pictures. These required matching for physical identity, basic object identity, and membership in the same superordinate category. S poken name-to-picture matching was tested for the last two conditions. An analogous set of conditions was presented for letters. Latency pat terns across the conditions showed general slowing for the aphasic pat ients, but with a differential decrement in the conditions that involv ed auditory (spoken name) input for the matching task. Results showed that variations in semantic judgment capability among the aphasics did not predict the patients' object naming ability. (C) 1997 Academic Pr ess, Inc.