Gr. Balls et al., INVESTIGATING MICROCLIMATIC INFLUENCES ON OZONE INJURY IN CLOVER (TRIFOLIUM-SUBTERRANEUM) USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, New phytologist, 132(2), 1996, pp. 271-280
Microclimatic factors interact during ozone episodes to influence the
sensitivity of plants to ozone and thus are likely to modify the amoun
t of injury development. This paper investigates these interactions in
an ozone-sensitive cultivar of clover (Trifolium subterraneum cv. Ger
aldton). Experiments were conducted using a glasshouse-based closed-ch
amber exposure system in which the plants were exposed for 7 h to eith
er charcoal-filtered air (CF) or CF plus ozone at concentrations rangi
ng from 40 to 160 ppb. The microclimatic conditions inside the chamber
s ranged from 16 to 36 degrees C, 0.9-3.6 kPa vapour pressure deficit
(VPD), and 80-460 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) Photosynthetically Active Radiati
on (PAR). Seven days after ozone exposure, the extent of foliar ozone
injury was scored visually. The assessment scoring system was validate
d by pigment analysis. The data from these exposures were analysed usi
ng artificial neural networks (ANNs), the principles of which are desc
ribed in the paper. Two ANNs were used, one to investigate the effects
of microclimate on the threshold AOT40 (dose accumulated above a thre
shold of 40 ppb) above which injury developed, the other to determine
the extent of visible injury development. Both networks used temperatu
re, VPD, PAR and AOT40 as inputs. Testing with previously unseen data
showed that the networks produced accurate predictions of the threshol
d and extent of injury for a range of ozone doses and microclimatic co
nditions. For example, the injury score network predicted that at 100
mu mol m(-2) s(-1) PAR and 1 kPa VPD an AOT40 of 350 ppb h was require
d to produce an injury score of 1, whereas in conditions of 400 mu mol
m(-2) s(-1) PAR and 3.5 kPa VPD, an AOT40 of 460 ppb h was required.
Analysis of the weightings of components of the trained networks indic
ated that VPD and PAR had a stronger influence on the response to ozon
e than did temperature. Furthermore, this approach revealed that micro
climate had a greater influence on the extent of ozone injury than on
the threshold for injury.