Fm. Baroody et al., EFFECTS OF LORATADINE AND TERFENADINE ON THE INDUCED NASAL ALLERGIC REACTION, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 122(3), 1996, pp. 309-316
Objective: To evaluate the effect of terfenadine and loratadine on the
early nasal allergic response to challenge and the subsequent cellula
r influx and hyperresponsiveness. Design: Double-blind, placebo-contro
lled, triple-crossover study. Subjects: Fourteen, asymptomatic, allerg
ic volunteers. Interventions: After an initial challenge with methacho
line chloride, subjects received treatment with placebo, loratadine (1
0 mg by mouth daily), or terfenadine (60 mg by mouth twice daily) for
1 week, followed by a nasal allergen challenge with lavages; 24 hours
later, while the subjects were still receiving medication, the quantit
y of cells in the nasal lavage was determined, and another challenge w
ith methacholine was done. Mediator levels were quantified in nasal la
vages after the allergen challenge, and the weight of the methacholine
-induced nasal secretions was measured. Results: Both loratadine and t
erfenadine treatment resulted in significant reductions in allergen-in
duced sneezing and the levels of histamine, kinins, albumin, and N-alp
ha-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester-esterase activity in recovered nasal
lavages compared with the reductions that resulted from placebo treatm
ent, with no significant difference among the treatments. Treatment ha
d no effect on the levels of tryptase,prostaglandin D-2, or leukotrien
e C-4. A significant eosinophil influx into nasal secretions 24 hours
after the allergen challenge in patients who were receiving placebo (P
=.006) was not affected by loratadine or terfenadine treatment. Compar
ing methacholine-induced secretions between screening challenges and c
hallenges with the patients who were being treated with either loratad
ine or terfenadine, there was a significant decrease in secretions aft
er the use of these antihistamines (P<.05). Conclusion: Both loratadin
e and terfenadine partially inhibit the early nasal response to allerg
en challenge and the subsequent reactivity to a challenge with methach
oline without affecting the influx of eosinophils into nasal secretion
s.