EFFECTS OF LORATADINE AND TERFENADINE ON THE INDUCED NASAL ALLERGIC REACTION

Citation
Fm. Baroody et al., EFFECTS OF LORATADINE AND TERFENADINE ON THE INDUCED NASAL ALLERGIC REACTION, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 122(3), 1996, pp. 309-316
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery
ISSN journal
08864470
Volume
122
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
309 - 316
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-4470(1996)122:3<309:EOLATO>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of terfenadine and loratadine on the early nasal allergic response to challenge and the subsequent cellula r influx and hyperresponsiveness. Design: Double-blind, placebo-contro lled, triple-crossover study. Subjects: Fourteen, asymptomatic, allerg ic volunteers. Interventions: After an initial challenge with methacho line chloride, subjects received treatment with placebo, loratadine (1 0 mg by mouth daily), or terfenadine (60 mg by mouth twice daily) for 1 week, followed by a nasal allergen challenge with lavages; 24 hours later, while the subjects were still receiving medication, the quantit y of cells in the nasal lavage was determined, and another challenge w ith methacholine was done. Mediator levels were quantified in nasal la vages after the allergen challenge, and the weight of the methacholine -induced nasal secretions was measured. Results: Both loratadine and t erfenadine treatment resulted in significant reductions in allergen-in duced sneezing and the levels of histamine, kinins, albumin, and N-alp ha-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester-esterase activity in recovered nasal lavages compared with the reductions that resulted from placebo treatm ent, with no significant difference among the treatments. Treatment ha d no effect on the levels of tryptase,prostaglandin D-2, or leukotrien e C-4. A significant eosinophil influx into nasal secretions 24 hours after the allergen challenge in patients who were receiving placebo (P =.006) was not affected by loratadine or terfenadine treatment. Compar ing methacholine-induced secretions between screening challenges and c hallenges with the patients who were being treated with either loratad ine or terfenadine, there was a significant decrease in secretions aft er the use of these antihistamines (P<.05). Conclusion: Both loratadin e and terfenadine partially inhibit the early nasal response to allerg en challenge and the subsequent reactivity to a challenge with methach oline without affecting the influx of eosinophils into nasal secretion s.