HEAT DEPOSITION RATE MEASUREMENTS USING A GRAPHITE QUASI-ADIABATIC CALORIMETER AND THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS IN A FUSION ENVIRONMENT OF THE LOTUS FACILITY
Op. Joneja et al., HEAT DEPOSITION RATE MEASUREMENTS USING A GRAPHITE QUASI-ADIABATIC CALORIMETER AND THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS IN A FUSION ENVIRONMENT OF THE LOTUS FACILITY, Fusion technology, 28(4), 1995, pp. 1663-1673
Heat deposition rate measurements are made by an extremely sensitive q
uasi-adiabatic graphite calorimeter and thermoluminescent dosimeters (
TLDs) in the fusion environment of the LOTUS facility. The response of
a bare calorimeter and the response inside a large graphite cylindric
al block are measured by irradiating with a mixed neutron and gamma fi
eld of the Haefely neutron generator. The reproducibility of these mea
surements is found to be better than 1% for a dose rate more than 60 c
Gy/min and better than 3.8% for dose rates in the range of 6 to 60 cGy
/min. The heating rates are found to vary linearly with neutron source
strength. The calculation to experiment (C/E)for the bare calorimeter
is found to be 1.05, whereas inside the graphite block, C/E varies fr
om 1.11 to 1.32. These measurements are analyzed by the MCNP Monte Car
lo neutron and photon transport code using the BMCCS2, PHOTXS2, and EL
2 cross-section libraries. The influence of wall-returned neutrons and
gammas is found to be negligible.The origin of the discrepancies is f
ound by measuring the gamma component of the heating at identical loca
tions by conducting special geometry irradiation using several TLDs-70
0. The conditions that are employed considerably simplify the transfor
mation of the TLD results to that of the graphite medium. A detailed d
ata treatment is done with the TLD outputs to arrive at the gamma heat
ing component at different locations in the graphite by employing the
Burlin theory. The gamma production is found to be well represented in
the calculations. On the other hand, measured and calculated net nucl
ear heating in the graphite differ considerably. A downward revision o
f the neutron kerma factor would be desirable.