INFLUENCE OF AGE ON THE TREATMENT OF LIMITED-STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER

Citation
Ll. Siu et al., INFLUENCE OF AGE ON THE TREATMENT OF LIMITED-STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER, Journal of clinical oncology, 14(3), 1996, pp. 821-828
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
0732183X
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
821 - 828
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-183X(1996)14:3<821:IOAOTT>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic importance of age on response rate and survival in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (S CLC), and to determine the effect of age on chemotherapy dose delivery and toxicity. Patients and Methods: We undertook a retrospective anal ysis of data from two multicenter, randomized trials conducted by the National Cancer institute of Canada (NCIC) in which 608 SCLC patients who presented with limited disease (LD) all received the same chemothe rapy. Treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincri stine (CAV), and etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) administered in an imme diate or delayed alternating fashion, plus cranial and thoracic irradi ation. Results: There were 520 patients aged less than 70 years,and 88 aged greater than or equal to 70. No significant differences existed between the two age groups in baseline characteristics, including trea tment protocol, performance status, and serum lactate dehydrogenase (L DH) level, There were more men in the older group (P = .05). Overall r esponse rates were comparable (78% v 82%, P = .50), and 5-year surviva l rates were also similar (P = .14), with 11% alive in the younger gro up and 8% in the older group, Age was a significant predictor of overa ll survival when analyzed as ct continuous variable in a univariate mo del (P = .01), bur it was no longer an independent prognostic factor i n our multivariate regression analysis, An analysis of chemotherapy de livery between the two age groups showed that patients aged greater th an or equal to 70 years received lower total doses of each drug compar ed with the intended full protocol dose, primarily as a result of dose omissions, rather than dose reductions, The frequency of dose delays was not different between groups. No significant differences were seen in the incidence of either hematologic or most nonhematologic toxicit ies. Conclusion: Age is not a significant adverse prognostic variable SCLC patients with LD, Moderately aggressive chemotherapy may be deliv ered safely to elderly patients with a good performance status, althou gh modest attenuation of therapy through either dose reduction or omis sion may occur more frequently in this population.