M. Weintraub et al., SEVERE ATYPICAL NEUROPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH ADMINISTRATION OF HEMATOPOIETIC COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS AND VINCRISTINE, Journal of clinical oncology, 14(3), 1996, pp. 935-940
Purpose: We have observed a severe atypical neuropathy (SAN) in patien
ts with small non-cleaved-cell (SNCL) and large-cell lymphoma (LCL) tr
eated with intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic colony-stimulating
factors (CSFs). The present analysis was undertaken in an attempt to
identify factors associated with the development of this syndrome. Pat
ients and Methods: Fifty-four adult and pediatric patients consecutive
ly treated according to the same chemotherapy protocol were included i
n the analysis. Low-risk patients received three cycles of cyclophosph
amide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate (CODOX-M)
while in high-risk patients this drug combination was alternated with
high-dose cytarabine (ara-C), etoposide, and ifosfamide (IVAC) for a t
otal of four cycles, Twenty-eight patients received a CSF (granulocyte
[G]- or granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF), and 26 patients received no
CSF, A statistical analysis, which included a logistic regression mod
el, was undertaken to examine the importance of potential contributing
factors to the development of SAN. Results: SAN, which consisted of e
xcruciating foot pain, usually associated with marked motor weakness,
was observed in 12 patients, There was a highly significant associatio
n between the occurrence of this syndrome and the administration of CS
Fs, and on independent association with the cumulative dose of vincris
tine given in the first cycle of chemotherapy. Furthermore, the analys
is suggested a synergistic effect between administration of the CSFs a
nd vincristine in the genesis of this neuropathy. Conclusion: Our resu
lts indicate that CSFs can precipitate SAN when given in conjunction w
ith vincristine. The development of SAN was associated most strongly w
ith the cumulative dose of vincristine-the size of individual doses an
d the number of doses given in cycle 1 were important to the extent th
at they influenced the cumulative dose.