Dunbar, Garud, and Raghuram (this issue) claim that managers must disc
redit their interpretive frames when these beliefs no longer match env
ironmental circumstances. Extending this argument, they conclude that
business schools should teach deframing skills to help managers period
ically destroy old beliefs and create new ones. In contrast, we argue
that managerial frames are neither accurate nor inaccurate and that a
frame's fit with the external environment is largely irrelevant. Inste
ad, we suggest that a firm's success is a function of its ability to i
mpose frames on the environment and that consistency of purpose and a
focused mindset are the keys to competitive advantage. Finally, we sug
gest that business education's primary task is to teach managers how t
o develop strategies that are based upon their firm's unique skills an
d to pursue these strategies relentlessly.