COMPARISON OF IN-VIVO EFFICACY OF HYPOXIC CYTOTOXIN TIRAPAZAMINE AND HYPOXIC CELL RADIOSENSITIZER KU-2285 IN COMBINATION WITH SINGLE AND FRACTIONATED-IRRADIATION
T. Shibata et al., COMPARISON OF IN-VIVO EFFICACY OF HYPOXIC CYTOTOXIN TIRAPAZAMINE AND HYPOXIC CELL RADIOSENSITIZER KU-2285 IN COMBINATION WITH SINGLE AND FRACTIONATED-IRRADIATION, Japanese journal of cancer research, 87(1), 1996, pp. 98-104
Development of strategies td eradicate radioresistant hypoxic cells wo
uld be of great benefit for clinical radiotherapy. In the present stud
y, the in vivo effects of a promising hypoxic cytotoxin, tirapazamine
(3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine 1,4-di-N-oxide), were examined in compari
son with those of KU-2285, one of the best hypoxic cell radiosensitize
rs, in combination with both single and fractionated irradiation. The
tumor response was assessed by the standard in vivo-in vitro clonogeni
c assay using SCCVII tumors in C3H mice and EMT-6/KU tumors in Balb/c
mice with different characteristics of tumor hypoxia. With single-dose
irradiation (18 Gy), both tirapazamine and KU-2285 showed significant
enhancement of cell killing in a dose-dependent manner, but tirapazam
ine was more effective for SCCVII tumors with acutely hypoxic cells, w
hile KU-2285 was more effective for EMT-6/KU tumors predominantly with
chronically hypoxic cells. In fractionated irradiation regimens (4 fr
actions of 5 Gy at 12 h intervals), tirapazamine showed more marked co
mbined effects at 10 and 20 mg/kg than KU-2285 at 100-200 mg/kg in bot
h SCCVII and EMT-6/KU tumors, We concluded that the effectiveness of K
U-2285 and tirapazamine was correlated with the nature of tumor hypoxi
a with single-dose irradiation, whereas tirapazamine appeared more pot
ent than KU-2285 with fractionated irradiation. These findings suggest
the potential usefulness of tirapazamine in clinical fractionated rad
iotherapy.