When a cardiac arrest occurs in a non-intensive area of the hospital,
the emergency response is not always adequate from the point of view o
f timeliness and technical quality. The aims of this study were to eva
luate an experimental programme to improve the CPR skills of staff ope
rating in non-intensive areas of our general hospital and to test the
usefulness of placing automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) within
these areas. In the experimental phase, two AEDs were placed in 2 non-
intensive wards of our hospital for 8 months. The staff of these wards
received specific training in CPR and early defibrillation (CPR-D). T
he devices were used in 19 cases: for defibrillation in four cases of
ventricular fibrillation (VF) (three patients were discharged alive fr
om hospital), and for monitoring three supraventricular ar rhythmias,
one bradyarrhythmia and 11 cardiac rhythms during critical clinical si
tuations. In the implementation phase, four AEDs were indefinitely ass
igned to as many non-intensive wards. Periodical CPR-D courses and ref
resher exercises were run; the cardiology staff co-operated in the mai
ntenance of the AEDs and in the registration of technical and clinical
data. In the first period of this phase (9 months), AEDs were utilize
d in 24 cases by the ward-staff: in nine cases for VF (three patients
were discharged alive from hospital) and in 15 cases for other rhythm
detection in critical conditions. The number and the quality of these
uses seem to confirm the favourable impact of the adoption of a more u
ser-friendly defibrillator, such as an AED. The active co-operation be
tween intensive and non-intensive staff was important to facilitate a
quick activation of the chain of survival outside the intensive care u
nits. We conclude that AEDs, which were developed for out-of-hospital
use by non-physician operators, are suitable for use inside the hospit
al as well.