Rl. Tucker et al., ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC AND RIGHT-SIDED CARDIAC PRESSURE COMPARISON OF THE MULE AND HORSE, Journal of equine veterinary science, 15(9), 1995, pp. 404-408
There are few physiologic studies that substantiate the popular belief
that mules are superior to horses as working animals. The purpose of
this study was to compare selected cardiac dimensions and right-sided
cardiac pressures of mules and horses. Using 2-D real time and M-mode
echocardiography and transjugular cardiac catheterization, resting car
diac dimensions and right-sided pressures were recorded from 10 adult
mules and 10 adult horses. The mules and horses were similar in size a
nd physical condition, and both groups had served equally as pack anim
als. The end diastolic left ventricular lumen diameter, interventricul
ar septal thickness, left ventricular free wall thickness, and aortic
root diameter measured (mean +/- SD) 9.51 +/- 0.92 cm, 2.63 +/- 0.34 c
m, 2.28 +/- 0.31 cm, 7.9 +/- 0.57 cm, respectively, in mules, and 9.83
+/- 0.87 cm, 2.83 +/- 0.29 cm, 2.39 +/- 0.33 cm, 7.9 +/- 0.36 cm, res
pectively, in horses. The end systolic left ventricular lumen diameter
measured 5.79 +/- 0.96 cm in mules and 5.94 +/- 0.99 cm in horses, yi
elding left ventricular luminal shortening fractions of 39.2 +/- 7.15%
in mules and 39.7 +/- 6.91% in horses. Right atrial mean pressure was
5.3 +/- 2.3 mm of Hg in mules and 5.8 +/- 1.2 mm Hg in horses. Right
ventricular peak systolic pressure was 47.9 +/- 4.9 mm Hg in mules and
47.7 +/- 3.5 mm Hg in horses. Pulmonary artery mean pressure was 27.3
+/- 3.2 mm Hg in mules and 28.1 +/- 3.6 mm Hg in horses. No significa
nt differences were detected between mules and horses for the resting
cardiac dimensions examined or right-sided pressures measured.