EFFECT OF FLECAINIDE ON ATRIAL AND VENTRICULAR REFRACTORINESS AND CONDUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL LEFT-VENTRICLE - IMPLICATIONS FOR POSSIBLE ANTIARRHYTHMIC AND PROARRHYTHMIC MECHANISMS
D. Katritsis et al., EFFECT OF FLECAINIDE ON ATRIAL AND VENTRICULAR REFRACTORINESS AND CONDUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL LEFT-VENTRICLE - IMPLICATIONS FOR POSSIBLE ANTIARRHYTHMIC AND PROARRHYTHMIC MECHANISMS, European heart journal, 16(12), 1995, pp. 1930-1935
We studied the effects of intravenous flecainide (2 mg.kg(-1)) on atri
al and ventricular refractoriness and conduction during sinus rhythm,
induced atrial fibrillation and atrial pacing at rates of 100, 120 and
150 ppm, in 14 patients with normal left ventricle. Flecainide caused
a significant increase in QRS duration during sinus rhythm (mean +/-
SD; 87.2 +/- 8.4 ms vs 102.8 +/- 9.1 ms, P<0.001), atrial fibrillation
(87.8 +/- 10.0 ms vs 108.8 +/- 13.7 ms, P<0.001) and at all paced rat
es. The duration of the atrial electrogram was significantly increased
during sinus rhythm (54.9 +/- 13.2 ms vs 64.8 +/- 16.6 ms, P = 0.003)
and at all pacing rates. The PA interval was also significantly prolo
nged, as was the pacing stimulus-to-atrial-electrogram interval at all
pacing rates. There was increased QRS duration and atrial electrogram
prolongation at higher pacing rates. Atrial refractoriness was prolon
ged during sinus rhythm (216.4 +/- 28.2 v 228.6 +/- 36.1, P = 0.02), b
ut not during atrial pacing at any rate. The QT interval, but not the
JT interval or ventricular refractoriness, was significantly prolonged
during sinus rhythm and at all pacing rates. Flecainide slows atrial
conduction in a use-dependent manner and increases atrial refractorine
ss during sinus rhythm but not during faster atrial pacing, thus not d
isplaying a use-dependent effect. QRS duration is prolonged in a use-d
ependent manner without a commensurate increase in ventricular refract
oriness. In the presence of rapidly conducted atrial fibrillation, whi
ch was not found to be slowed by flecainide, this effect may constitut
e a proarrhythmic mechanism even in patients with no apparent myocardi
al abnormality.