For two decades, environmental economists have generally maintained th
at benefit uncertainty is irrelevant for choosing between price and qu
antity instruments, but that cost uncertainty matters, with the identi
ty of the efficient instrument depending upon the relative slopes of t
he marginal benefit and cost functions. But, in the presence of simult
aneous, correlated uncertainty, such policy instrument recommendations
may be inappropriate. With plausible values of relevant parameters, t
he conventional identification of a price instrument will be reversed,
to favor instead a quantity instrument. The opposite reversal-from th
e choice of a quantity instrument to a price instrument-seems less lik
ely to occur. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.