Kg. Lehmann et al., CONTRIBUTIONS OF FREQUENCY-DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS TO THE UNDERSTANDINGOF CORONARY RESTENOSIS - A REAPPRAISAL OF THE GAUSSIAN CURVE, Circulation, 93(6), 1996, pp. 1123-1132
Background Clinical restenosis after balloon angioplasty can be catego
rized by use of dichotomous terms based on the presence or absence of
recurrent myocardial ischemia. In contrast, recent investigations have
concluded that late luminal renarrowing, documented through angiograp
hic imaging, occurs to a variable extent in nearly all stenoses. This
process has been characterized by a guassian or normal frequency distr
ibution, with restenosis simply representing an extreme form of this d
elayed remodeling. In the current study, frequency distribution analys
is was used to examine the process of coronary restenosis in a large c
ohort of patients at risk. Methods and Results Quantitative coronary a
ngiographic analysis was applied to 9279 cineangiograms obtained in 30
93 patients before and immediately after angioplasty and after 6-month
follow-up. Late loss, defined as the change in minimum lumen diameter
of the target stenosis from postdilation to follow-up, did not statis
tically conform to a normal distribution (P<.0001 by both chi(2) stati
stic and Kolmogorov-Smirov test), even after the exclusion of the 236
stenoses that displayed total occlusions at follow-up angiography. Exa
mination of deviations from a normal curve revealed an excessively hig
h frequency of stenoses that experienced either little change (0.0+/-0
.3 mm) or marked changed (1.0 to 2.0 mm) in late loss, with a low freq
uency of stenoses with intermediate values (0.3 to 1.0 mm). Similarly,
although the distribution of percent diameter stenosis of the target
lesion was statistically normal immediately after dilation, this gauss
ian distribution disappeared during the follow-up period. Other angiog
raphic indexes of restenosis also failed to approximate a normal curve
. In an attempt to improve the goodness of fit, a probabilistic model
of late loss was created on the basis of deconvolution of the observed
data distribution. Two theoretical, discrete populations of stenoses
were identified, one with and one without overall late luminal narrowi
ng. Unlike the gaussian distribution, this model provided a good repre
sentation of the observed data (P=NS for lack of fit). Conclusions The
frequency distributions of angiographic indexes of restenosis often s
uperficially resemble a gaussian curve, an appearance that is artifact
ually enhanced by the measurement imprecision of current quantitative
techniques. Nevertheless, standard indexes of coronary restenosis fail
to conform statistically to a normal distribution. The pattern of dev
iations observed supports the possible existence of discrete subpopula
tions of lesions, each with a different propensity toward the developm
ent of restenosis after coronary intervention.