We examine how various sources of information contribute to the percep
t of motion in depth. Subjects were presented with targets moving in d
epth, and were asked to judge their velocities and final positions. On
each presentation, the target's position relative to the two eyes (ta
rget vergence), the size of the target's retinal image and the differe
nce in this image's position relative to that of the background in the
two eyes (relative disparity), each either changed as they normally w
ould for a target moving at a fixed speed towards the observer, or did
not change at all. Subjects' judgements for various such combinations
show that all three sources of information influence both the perceiv
ed velocity of motion in depth and the final perceived position, but i
n different ways. This is not too surprising, because the assumptions
that the use of each source of information are based on, are different
for the two tasks. We propose that the way the different sources are
combined is governed by the likelihood of the assumptions, that are re
quired to use that information, being true under the given circumstanc
es.