Fl. Schuster et M. Levandowsky, CHEMOSENSORY RESPONSES OF ACANTHAMOEBA-CASTELLANII - VISUAL ANALYSIS OF RANDOM MOVEMENT AND RESPONSES TO CHEMICAL SIGNALS, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology, 43(2), 1996, pp. 150-158
A visual assay slide chamber was used in conjunction with time-lapse v
ideomicroscopy to analyze chemotactic behavior of axenically grown Aca
nthamoeba castellanii. Data were collected and analyzed as vector scat
ter diagrams and cell tracks. Amebas responded to a variety of bacteri
al products or potential bacterial products by moving actively toward
the attractant. Responses to the chemotactic peptide formyl-methionyl-
leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), lipopolysaccharide, and lipid A were stat
istically significant (P less than or equal to 0.03), as was the respo
nse to fMLP benzylamide (P less than or equal to 0.05). Significant re
sponses to cyclic AMP, lipoteichoic acid, and N-acetyl glucosamine wer
e also found. Chemotactic peptide antagonists, mannose, mannosylated b
ovine serum albumin, and N-acetyl muramic acid all yielded nonsignific
ant responses (P > 0.05). There was no single optimal concentration fo
r response to any of the attractants tested, and amebas responded equa
lly over the range of concentrations tested. Pretreatment of amebas wi
th chemotactic peptides, bacterial products, and bacteria reduced the
directional response to attractants. Amebas that had been grown in the
presence of bacteria appeared more responsive to chemotactic peptides
. Treatment of amebas with trypsin reduced the response of cells to ch
emotactic peptides, though sensitivity was restored within a couple of
hours. This suggests the ameba membrane may have receptors, sensitive
to these bacterial substances, which are different from the mannose r
eceptors involved in binding bacteria to the membrane during phagocyto
sis. The rate of movement was relatively constant (ca. 0.40 mu m/s), i
ndicating that the locomotor response to these signals is a taxis, or
possibly a klinokinesis, but not an orthokinesis. Studies of the popul
ation diffusion rate in the absence of signals indicate that the basic
population motility follows the pattern of a Levy walk, rather than t
he more familiar Gaussian diffusion. This suggests that the usual math
ematical models of ameboid dispersion may need to be modified.