The management of patients with acute aortic dissection requires a rap
id diagnosis and precise information about the localization and extent
of the dissection. Four imaging techniques are currently available to
diagnose aortic dissection: aortography; contrast-enhanced computeriz
ed tomography (CECT); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and transesoph
ageal echocardiography (TEE). All of these techniques have their speci
fic advantages and inherent limitations. Recent studies have demonstra
ted that MRI may best provide a comprehensive and detailed evaluation
of the thoracic aorta, therefore proposing this technique as a ''new g
old standard'' in the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection. TEE, howev
er, may be the best alternative technique, as it combines high sensiti
vity and specificity with high practicality. The practicality is parti
cularly important in hemodynamically unstable patients in whom a rapid
bedside imaging modality is required. CECT might be necessary in sele
cted cases in, whom TEE fails to provide a definite diagnosis. Aortogr
aphy may be necessary in patients in whom clinical signs are suggestiv
e of organ ischemia and in whom coronary anatomy needs to be delineate
d before operation.