Ja. Buford et al., CONTRASTING LOCATIONS OF PALLIDAL-RECEIVING NEURONS AND MICROEXCITABLE ZONES IN PRIMATE THALAMUS, Journal of neurophysiology, 75(3), 1996, pp. 1105-1116
1. In two awake, juvenile male Macaca fascicularis monkeys, microstimu
lation was applied in ventralis anterior (VA), ventralis lateralis (VL
), or ventralis posterior lateralis (VPL) of the thalamus. Thalamic re
cording was used to identify the region that contained pallidal-receiv
ing (PR) thalamic neurons, cells that responded orthodromically to sti
mulation in the internal pallidal segment (GPi). Thalamic stimulation
was used to elicit motor responses. Penetrations in the thalamus and t
he pallidum focused on areas with activity related to contralateral ar
m movement. Fifty one PR cells were identified electrophysiologically
in VL oralis (VLo), VL caudalis (VLc) and VA pars parvocellularis (VAp
c). 2. With a subject at rest, trains of stimuli were applied through
the thalamic microelectrode. Palpable or visible muscle twitches or jo
int movements were evoked by short trains (12 pulses) of stimuli appli
ed in VLc and VPL oralis (VPLo); thresholds there ranged from 5 to 75
mu A. In VA and VLo, areas where PR neurons were located, even longer
trains (24 pulses) of stimuli with currents up to 200 mu A usually fai
led to evoke movement. In the caudal portions of VLo, near VPLo, there
were some microexcitable sites found near PR cells where stimuli at s
imilar to 50 mu A elicited movement. 3. From microstimulation studies
combined with histological reconstruction, Ashe and co-workers hypothe
sized that microexcitable zones were cerebellar receiving areas (CR) a
nd nonexcitable zones were PR areas. Our data support theirs and add e
lectrophysiological identification of PR areas. Further, we injected w
heat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) into the thalamu
s at one of the more rostral microexcitable sites, just caudal and lat
eral to identified PR cells. The tetra-methyl benzidine-reacted HRP la
bel was found in the contralateral deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) but no
t in ipsilateral GPi, showing that even this rostral microexcitable zo
ne was a CR area. 4. Together with evidence from the literature, the d
ata are consistent with the hypothesis that PR cells have relatively w
eak access to spinal-destined motor outputs, whereas thalamocortical n
eurons from VPLo and VLc have more secure access. In addition to chara
cteristics of cell discharge and responses to somatosensory stimulatio
n, microexcitability may be a further aid in tentative electrophysiolo
gical identification of PR versus CR areas of the motor thalamus witho
ut necessarily recording thalamic neuronal responses to stimulation in
GPi or the DCN.