Information manipulation theory (IMT) applies Grice's (1975; 1989) con
versational maxims to the design of deceptive messages, but ignores th
e role of implicatures in deception. As a result, IMT proposes a dubio
us editing model of deception and an implausible conception of what it
is that makes a deceptive message misleading. An alternative model, b
ased on Grice's theory of implicature, proposes that deception involve
s the manipulation of information so as to generate false implicatures
. McCornack's (1992; McCornack et al., 1992) studies are replicated wi
th the inclusion of explicit checks to determine the covertness of the
pu deceptive messages and to check manipulation of information-type (
Quantity, Quality, Relevance, and Manner violations). None of the resu
lts are consistent with IMT predictions. Instead, the results uniforml
y support a model of deceptive message design based on conversational
implicature.