Mj. Villamide, METHODS OF ENERGY EVALUATION OF FEED INGREDIENTS FOR RABBITS AND THEIR ACCURACY, Animal feed science and technology, 57(3), 1996, pp. 211-223
The influence of the methodology used in the evaluation of feed ingred
ients for rabbits on the precision of determination is reviewed. The p
rocedures for calculation of the energy values and their standard erro
rs are shown and discussed for each method. The direct method used for
evaluating some relatively balanced feedstuffs such as alfalfa hay or
wheat bran gives consistent results, but over- or underestimation and
low repeatability is obtained with most imbalanced ingredients. For t
he substitution method, two calculation procedures of the energy value
s are compared, showing greater accuracy with the equation in which th
e gross energy of the ingredient is determined directly instead of est
imated by difference. The basal diet acid the rate/s of substitution m
ust be designed to avoid a great nutrient imbalance in all the experim
ental diets. The substitution rate is the main factor in the precision
of estimation of feedstuff evaluation, being directly related to the
accuracy. Thus, the standard error of the ingredient. energy value est
imated by difference is 13.4, 6.4 and 2.9 times higher than the standa
rd error of diets for 10%, 20% and 40% substitution rates, respectivel
y. The number of replicates is of limited importance in comparison wit
h the substitution rate; thus, the numbers of rabbits required to esti
mate the mean energy value within +/-5% with a 95% confidence are 37 a
nd 10 for 20% and 40% substitution rates, respectively. Therefore, the
energy value of ingredients that are usually included in diets in hig
h proportions (20-30%) can be obtained with good precision by differen
ce using only one rate of substitution. Several levels of inclusion (f
our or more) must be used when interactions between ingredients are ex
pected or very low rates of inclusion are used. In this case, the ener
gy value is estimated by extrapolation of the regression between the d
igestible energy of diets and the substitution rates and a greater pre
cision than by difference is obtained. The multiregression method is r
arely used because of the great number of ingredients included in the
diets and because of the existence of interactions among them, prevent
ing the correct estimation of their energy values.