Mpm. Burger et al., EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVIDENCE OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA WITHOUT THE PRESENCE OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS, British Journal of Cancer, 73(6), 1996, pp. 831-836
The aim of this paper was to provide epidemiological evidence to suppo
rt the notion that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) without hu
man papillomavirus (HPV) is a true entity. If a diagnosis of HPV-negat
ive cervical neoplasia is erroneous, one would not expect there to be
any differences in risk factors between HPV-positive and HPV-negative
patients. Patients at a gynaecological outpatient clinic of a universi
ty hospital [a total of 265 consecutive women with dyskaryotic cervica
l smears who were subsequently diagnosed with CIN I (n=37), CIN II (n=
43) or CIN III (n=180)] completed a structured questionnaire regarding
smoking habits and sexual history. Analysis of an endocervical swab f
or Chlamydia trachomatis, analysis of a cervical scrape for HPV, and m
orphological examination of cervical biopsy specimens were also perfor
med. HPV was found in 205 (77.4%) out of the 265 women. Univariate ana
lysis showed that current age (P= 0.02), current smoking behaviour (P=
0.002) and the number of sexual partners (P=0.02) were significantly a
ssociated with the presence of HPV. Age at first sexual intercourse, a
past history of venereal disease or genital warts, and current infect
ion with Chlamydia trachomatis were not associated with the presence o
f HPV. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the number of
sexual partners and current smoking behaviour showed an independent si
gnificant association with HPV. HPV-negative and HPV-positive CIN pati
ents differ with respect to the risk factors for HPV. These findings s
uggest that HPV-negative CIN is a separate true entity.