Kga. Gilhuijs et al., INTERACTIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION OF PATIENT SETUP IN RADIATION-THERAPY USING DIGITAL PORTAL IMAGES AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY DATA, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 34(4), 1996, pp. 873-885
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Presently, the majority of clinical tools to quantify deviati
ons in patient setup during external beam radiotherapy is based on two
-dimensional (2D) analysis of portal images, The purpose of this study
is to develop a tool for the inspection of the patient setup in three
dimensions (3D) and to validate its clinical advantage over methods b
ased on 2D analysis in the presence of out-of-plane rotations. Methods
and Materials: We developed an interactive procedure to quantify the
setup deviation of the patient in 3D, The procedure is based on fast c
omputation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) in two beam d
irections and comparison of these DRRs with corresponding portal image
s. The potential of the tool is demonstrated on three selected cases o
f prostate and parotid gland treatment where conventional 2D analysis
produced inconsistent results, The measurements from 3D analysis are c
ompared with those obtained from the 2D analysis.Results: Despite appl
ication of an immobilization cast, two investigated parotid gland setu
ps showed rotational deviations in 3D up to 3 degrees. Two-dimensional
analysis of these deviations produced inconsistent results. Analysis
of the selected prostate setup in 3D showed a rotational deviation of
7 degrees around the left-right axis, possibly causing displacement of
the seminal vesicles towards the borders of the conformal boost field
s, Using 2D analysis, this out-of-plane rotation was misinterpreted as
a translation resulting in the failure to trigger the decision protoc
ol to correct the setup after the first fraction, Using the 3D patient
setup analysis procedure, an accuracy of the order of 1 mm and 1 degr
ees (SD) could be obtained, The computation time of the interactive DR
Rs is of the order of 1 s on a 60 MHz PC. The complete interactive 3D
analysis requires about 10 min. Conclusions: Quantification of the pat
ient setup in 3D provides essential additional information in cases wh
ere conventional 2D analysis is inconsistent, e.g., in the presence of
out-of-plane rotations or geometrical degeneracies, The speed and acc
uracy of the interactive 3D patient setup inspection are acceptable fo
r use in offline clinical studies and analysis of problem cases.