Purpose: To describe current practice patterns in treating infectious
keratitis. Methods: A questionnaire was designed that asked ophthalmol
ogists to describe the diagnostic equipment accessible to their practi
ce for performing smears and obtaining scrapings for microbial culture
and sensitivity testing. The questionnaire also presented two hypothe
tical cases of patients with infectious keratitis. Bacterial keratitis
was relatively early and less severe in the first patient, and it was
more advanced and more severe in the second patient. Recipients were
asked about their diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The survey was
mailed to 300 ophthalmologists in Florida, Illinois, and New York. Res
ults: One hundred twenty-four completed surveys (45%) were returned. S
ix surveys were from cornea specialists, who were excluded from the an
alysis. Only 18 practices (15%) maintained access to Gram stain suppli
es, and 58 (50%) maintained culture supplies. Whereas 56% of responden
ts would treat the patient with the less severe bacterial keratitis wi
thout obtaining samples for cultures, only 13% would treat the patient
with the more severe condition in this manner (P < 0.00001). Of the r
espondents, 82% would treat the patient with the less severe bacterial
keratitis with a fluoroquinolone, compared with 62% for the patient w
ith the more severe infection (P = 0.002). The mean frequency of fluor
oquinolone administration for the patient with more-severe bacterial k
eratitis was one drop every 0.88 hours, compared with one drop every 1
.48 hours for the patient with the less severe infection. Conclusions:
Ophthalmologists appear to treat suspected infectious keratitis diffe
rently, depending on perceived severity; they choose different antibio
tic regimens; and are more likely to forgo scrapings for Gram staining
and cultures for ulcers that appear less severe. The justification fo
r this approach should be established.