Ip. Chung et D. Dunnrankin, IN-SITU LIGHT-SCATTERING MEASUREMENTS OF MAINSTREAM AND SIDESTREAM CIGARETTE-SMOKE, Aerosol science and technology, 24(2), 1996, pp. 85-101
This paper presents in situ and continuous size measurements for submi
cron cigarette smoke particles. The method, which can be applied to an
y ensemble of small particles narrowly distributed in size, uses the l
ight scattered from the particles at angles of 60 degrees and 120 degr
ees and the ratio of polarization components of the scattered light at
55 degrees to determine the mean particle size. Polystyrene latex sph
eres diluted in distilled water are used to calibrate the system. Good
agreement exists between the experimental measurements and the theore
tical calculations for the calibration particles. Based on the assumpt
ion that cigarette smoke particles cluster into locally uniform parcel
s during their formation as condensate, the light scattering system is
employed to measure the mean size and size fluctuations of mainstream
smoke and sidestream smoke from research cigarettes (1R3 and 1R3f). S
imilar light scattering techniques have been employed by other researc
hers, but this paper describes in situ measurements of smoke without a
ging or dilution. These in situ measurements characterize the spatial
inhomogeneity of cigarette smoke, and show that sidestream smoke is ap
proximately 0.27 mu m in count median diameter (CMD) with a geometric
standard deviation (GSD) of 1.60 and that mainstream smoke has a CMD o
f approximately 0.15 mu m with a GSD of 2.0, The corresponding mass me
dian diameters are approximately 0.50 and 0.70 mu m, respectively. Int
erestingly, there is little difference in the mean size of sidestream
smoke fresh from the tip of a smoldering cigarette and sidestream smok
e captured in a vessel. There are differences, however, in the cluster
ing of the smoke and in its nonuniformity. Fresh sidestream smoke exhi
bits more size fluctuation, but less fluctuation in local particle num
ber density when compared to captured sidestream smoke. The measuremen
ts also indicate little difference between mainstream smoke from cigar
ettes with and without filters. Based on the assumption that the smoke
partitions into small parcels with relatively narrow size distributio
ns within parcels, the calculated relative number density of fresh sid
estream smoke particles is fairly uniform, while the number density fl
uctuates significantly for mainstream and captured sidestream smoke.