Fe. Dayan et al., PHYSIOLOGICAL-BASIS FOR DIFFERENTIAL SENSITIVITY TO SULFENTRAZONE BY SICKLEPOD (SENNA-OBTUSIFOLIA) AND COFFEE SENNA (CASSIA-OCCIDENTALIS), Weed science, 44(1), 1996, pp. 12-17
Consistent with field observations, sicklepod exhibited considerable t
olerance to sulfentrazone, and coffee senna showed relatively high sen
sitivity to this herbicide in greenhouse tests. Germination was not in
hibited in either species at up to 12.9 mu M of the herbicide. However
, the chlorophyll content of herbicide-treated coffee senna cotyledona
ry leaves was greatly reduced, and seedlings died within 10 d after tr
eatment, while sicklepod seedlings were not visibly affected. Shoot he
ight of coffee senna was inhibited 90% by sulfentrazone at 0.5 kg ai h
a(-1), while the growth of sicklepod was not affected up to 2.0 kg ai
ha(-1). Root uptake of radiolabeled sulfentrazone was 74% greater in c
offee senna than sicklepod, but the amount of radioactivity recovered
from the shoots of both species after 12 h was not different. Eighty-t
hree percent of the parent compound remained in coffee senna leaf tiss
ue after 9 h root exposure to the herbicide. In contrast, sicklepod to
ok up relatively less sulfentrazone through the root and metabolized s
ulfentrazone in the foliage more rapidly than coffee senna, with 91.6%
of the herbicide being metabolized during the first 9 h of exposure.
These results suggest that the tolerance of sicklepod to sulfentrazone
is primarily due to a relatively high rate of metabolism of the herbi
cide compared to coffee senna.