H. Tateno et al., DIFFERENCE IN TYPES OF RADIATION-INDUCED STRUCTURAL CHROMOSOME-ABERRATIONS AND THEIR INCIDENCES BETWEEN CHINESE AND SYRIAN-HAMSTER SPERMATOZOA, Mutation research, 350(2), 1996, pp. 339-348
The effects of ionizing radiations on sperm chromosomes were studied i
n the Chinese hamster (Crisetulus griseus) and the Syrian (golden) ham
ster (Mesocrisetus auratus). Testes of mature male Chinese hamsters (C
H) were irradiated with X-rays (0.91, 1.82 and 3.63 Gy) and gamma-rays
(1.10, 2.15, 2.95 and 4.01 Gy) at a single acute dosage, whereas the
irradiation was done with lower doses of X-rays (0.45, 0.91 and 1.82 G
y) and gamma-rays (0.49, 0.99 and 1.98 Gy) in mature male Syrian hamst
ers (SH), taking the higher radiosensitivity of this species into cons
ideration. They were mated with normal females within 6 days of exposu
re. Sperm-derived chromosomes were analyzed in 1125 and 1966 fertilize
d ova of the CH and the SH, respectively. In both species, there was n
o great difference in the induction of structural chromosome aberratio
ns between X-irradiated and gamma-irradiated spermatozoa. Chromosome-t
ype aberrations were predominantly induced. The incidence of breakage-
type aberrations increased linearly, and that of exchange-type aberrat
ions lineal-quadratically with increase of dosage. A species-specific
difference in chromosomal radiosensitivity of spermatozoa was clear. I
n spite of the same radiation dosage, the incidence of chromosomally a
bnormal spermatozoa in the SH was about twice as high as that in the C
H (e.g., 27.0% vs. 14.7% at 0.91 Gy of X-rays). The incidences of brea
kage-type aberrations (69-89%) were far higher than those of exchange-
type aberrations (11-31%) in the SH, while the disparity of the two in
cidences was much smaller in the CH (46-65% vs. 35-54%). Exchange-type
aberrations consisted of both chromosome-type and chromatid-type in t
he SH, while almost all of them were of the chromosome-type in the CH.
These results suggest that the DNA-repairing capacity of oocytes is m
uch higher in the CH than in the SH. Moreover, it seems likely that ra
diation-induced sperm DNA damage is repaired with both pre-replication
repair (excision repair) and pest-replication repair systems in SH oo
cytes, whereas the excision repair system operate most exclusively in
CH oocytes.