SPIRAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE RENAL-ARTERIES - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON WITH INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAARTERIAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY
Mt. Farres et al., SPIRAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE RENAL-ARTERIES - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON WITH INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAARTERIAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY, Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 19(2), 1996, pp. 101-106
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of computed tomographic angiography (C
TA) in the evaluation of the renal arteries in comparison with intrave
nous (IVDSA) and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA)
. Methods: In 18 patients, 35 CTAs and DSAs (27 IADSA, 8 IVDSA) of the
renal arteries were performed. CTA was done with 2-3 mm collimation,
2-4 mm/sec table speed, after intravenous injection of 80 mi of contra
st medium at 4 ml/sec with a scanning delay time of 14-21 sec. No prev
ious circulation time curve was performed. CTA data were reconstructed
with maximum intensity projection (MIP) and shaded surface display (S
SD). The presence of stenosis was assessed on a three-point rating sca
le (grade 1-3). The quality of the examinations; visualization of the
ostium, the main artery, and its branches; vessel sharpness, linearity
, and intraluminal contrast filling were evaluated. We compared CTA wi
th DSA. Results: CTA had 96% sensitivity, 77% specificity, and 89% acc
uracy in the detection of stenoses > 50%. Due to technical errors two
stenoses were erroneously diagnosed as positive but there were no fals
e negative diagnoses. The quality of CTA was good in 56% and moderate
in 34% of cases. Visualization of the ostium and main artery was grade
d as 1.74 (out of 2) points and of the renal branches as 1.02 (out of
2) points. The quality of CTA images was worse than that of IADSA in 5
2%, equal in 41%, and better in 7% of cases. CTA was equal to IVDSA in
25% and better in 75% of the cases. Conclusion: CTA is an accurate no
ninvasive method for the evaluation of renal arteries. Examination qua
lity is essential for the diagnosis. CTA is limited in its ability to
visualize the branches of the renal artery and accessory arteries. CTA
seems to be superior to IVDSA.