A wide range of air-standard Brayton and modified-Brayton power cycles
are evaluated to determine their second-law efficiencies and their vo
lume flows per unit output. A cycle with reheating is chosen for furth
er analysis on the basis of its potential for high efficiency through
exploitation of its exhaust availability (exergy) and its low volume r
ates. This exploitation can be had either through a conventional Ranki
ne bottoming cycle, or through injection of the bottoming cycle steam
into the Brayton turbine. The Rankine bottoming cycle is superior with
respect to second-law efficiency; the cycle augmented by injected ste
am is superior with respect to volume flows. Examination of irreversib
ilities illuminates the reasons for the better efficiency of the Ranki
ne bottoming cycle alternative.