Women in developing countries are dying from simple preventable condit
ions but what impact can the procedures collectively called antenatal
care have in reducing maternal mortality and morbidity? More important
ly what is antenatal care? This review found that questions have been
raised about the impact of antenatal care (specifically on maternal mo
rtality) since its inception in developed countries, and that although
the questions continue to be asked there is very little research tryi
ng to find answers. Many antenatal procedures are essentially screenin
g tests yet it was found that there were very few results showing sens
itivity and specificity, and that they rarely complied with the establ
ished criteria for the effectiveness of a screening test. The acknowle
dged gold standard measurement of effectiveness is the randomized cont
rolled trial, yet the only results available referred to nutritional s
upplementation. This service of flawed methodology has been exported t
o developing countries and is being promoted by WHO and other agencies
. This paper argues that there is insufficient evidence to reach a fir
m decision about the effectiveness of antenatal care, yet there is suf
ficient evidence to cast doubt on the possible effect of antenatal car
e. Research is urgently required in order to identify those procedures
which aught to be included in the antenatal process. In the final ana
lysis the greatest impact will be achieved by developing a domiciliary
midwifery service supported by appropriate local efficient obstetric
services. That this domiciliary service should provide care for women
in pregnancy is not disputed but the specific nature of this care need
s considerable clarification.