Background: To ensure rapid recovery of neuromuscular block, it might
be useful to administer a short-acting relaxant after a long-acting on
e. Therefore, the interaction between pancuronium and mivacurium was i
nvestigated when mivacurium was administered during the recovery from
pancuronium block. Methods: After written informed consent, 41 adult p
atients were studied during propofol/alfentanil/nitrous oxide/oxygen a
nesthesia. Neuromuscular function was monitored using an electromyogra
phic (EMG) method. After a stable EMG calibration response, cumulative
doses of pancuronium were given to establish a 95% neuromuscular bloc
k. In the control group, an ED(95) dose of 100 mu g/kg mivacurium was
administered instead of pancuronium. When the EMG response after pancu
ronium or mivacurium had recovered to 25% of the baseline, a single ra
ndomized Intravenous bolus dose of 10 or 70 mu g/ kg mivacurium was gi
ven. Thereafter, spontaneous recovery of the neuromuscular function wa
s recorded. Results: The time from pancuronium until T1 25% EMG recove
ry was 38 +/- 12 min (mean +/- SD). The respective times after 10 or 7
0 mu g/kg mivacurium were 28 +/- 8 and 54 +/- 7 min in the pancuronium
group of 3 +/- 1 (n = 3) and 10 +/- 4 min in the mivacurium group (P
= 0.0001). Times to 95% EMG recovery after 10 or 70 mu g/kg mivacurium
were 77 +/- 14 and 97 +/- 16 min in the pancuronium group and 11 +/-
3 and 20 +/- 7 min in the mivacurium group, respectively (P < 0.0001).
Recovery indexes after 10 or 70 mu g/kg mivacurium were 26 +/- 4 and
22 +/- 6 min in the pancuronium group or 7 +/- 3 (n = 3) and 5 +/- 2 m
in in the mivacurium group, respectively (P < 0.0001). Times from the
administration of 10 or 70 mu g/kg mivacurium until train-of-four rati
o 0.7 were 94 +/- 16 and 111 +/- 14 min in the pancuronium group and 1
2 +/- 8 and 22 +/- 8 min in the mivacurium group, respectively (P < 0.
0001). Conclusions: After pancuronium, mivacurium is not a short-actin
g neuromuscular blocking agent.