INTERLABORATORY EVALUATION OF ETEST METHOD FOR TESTING ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF PATHOGENIC YEASTS TO 5 ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS BY USING CASITONE AGAR AND SOLIDIFIED RPMI-1640 MEDIUM WITH 2-PERCENT GLUCOSE
A. Espinelingroff et al., INTERLABORATORY EVALUATION OF ETEST METHOD FOR TESTING ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF PATHOGENIC YEASTS TO 5 ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS BY USING CASITONE AGAR AND SOLIDIFIED RPMI-1640 MEDIUM WITH 2-PERCENT GLUCOSE, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(4), 1996, pp. 848-852
An interlaboratory evaluation (two centers) of the Etest method was co
nducted for testing the antifungal susceptibilities of yeasts. The MIC
s of amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine, itraconazole, and ketoc
onazole were determined for 83 isolates of Candida spp., Cryptococcus
neoformans, and Torulopsis glabrata. Two buffered (phosphate buffer) c
ulture media were evaluated: solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% gluco
se and Casitone agar, MIC endpoints were determined after both 24 and
48 h of incubation at 35 degrees C. Analysis of 3,420 MICs demonstrate
d higher interlaboratory agreement (percentage of MIC pairs within a 2
-dilution range) with Casitone medium than with RPMI 1640 medium when
testing amphotericin B (84 to 90% versus 1 to 4%), itraconazole (87% v
ersus 63 to 74%), and ketoconazole (94 to 96% versus 88 to 90%). In co
ntrast, better interlaboratory reproducibility was determined between
fluconazole MIC pairs when RPMI 1640 medium rather than Casitone mediu
m was used (96 to 98% versus 77 to 90%). Comparison of the flucytosine
MICs obtained with RPMI 1640 medium revealed greater than 80% reprodu
cibility. The study suggests the potential value of the Etest as a con
venient alternative method for testing the susceptibilities of yeasts.
It also indicates the need for further optimization of medium formula
tions and MIC endpoint criteria to improve interlaboratory agreement.