Ma. Smith et al., SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF PROPIONIBACTERIUM-ACNES COMPARING AGAR DILUTION WITH E-TEST, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(4), 1996, pp. 1024-1026
Propionibacterium acnes has been identified as a significant agent of
nosocomial infections, including endophthalmitis. Data concerning susc
eptibility of P. acnes to newer beta-lactam antibiotics and fluoroquin
olones are limited. Recent reports suggest that quinolones have activi
ty against these organisms sufficient to warrant further study. We und
ertook a study to select appropriate antimicrobial agents for use in a
rabbit model of P. acnes endophthalmitis. We compared the antibiotic
susceptibilities of P. acnes by using the National Committee for Clini
cal Laboratory Standards method of agar dilution with the E test, Thir
teen clinical isolates obtained from eye specimens and three American
Type Culture Collection control strains were tested against 14 antibio
tics, All the clinical isolates were susceptible by both methods to pi
peracillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin
-clavulanate, cefotaxime, cefotetan, ceftriaxone, cefoxitin, and imipe
nem in addition to clindamycin but were resistant to metronidazole. Th
e clinical P. acnes isolates also displayed high-level susceptibility
to ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ofloxacin. Almost all the P. acnes
strains demonstrated E-test MICs within 2 dilutions of the MICs obser
ved by the agar dilution method, Those few strains for which discrepan
cies were noted exhibited E-test susceptibilities three- to fivefold d
ilutions lower than the agar dilution method susceptibilities but only
with ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and/or clindamyci
n. On the basis of our study, all of our clinical eye isolates were su
sceptible to these newer antimicrobial agents and the two methods demo
nstrated similar susceptibility patterns.