When commercial banks make loans to firms and also underwrite securiti
es, does this hamper or enhance their role as certifiers of firm value
? This paper examines empirically the pricing of bank-underwritten sec
urities as compared to investment-house-underwritten securities over a
unique period in the U.S. (pre-Glass-Steagall) when both banks and in
vestment houses were allowed to underwrite securities. The evidence sh
ows that investors were willing to pay higher prices for securities un
derwritten by banks rather than investment houses. The results support
a certification role for banks, which is more valuable for junior and
information sensitive securities.