Mc. Fabrizio et al., COMPARISON OF 3 NONLINEAR MODELS TO DESCRIBE LONG-TERM TAG SHEDDING BY LAKE TROUT, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 125(2), 1996, pp. 261-273
We estimated long-term tag-shedding rates for lake trout Salvelinus na
maycush using two existing models and a model we developed to account
for the observed permanence of some tags. Because tag design changed o
ver the course of the study, we examined tag-shedding rates for three
types of numbered anchor tags (Floy tags FD-67, FD-67C, and FD-68BC) a
nd an unprinted anchor tag (FD-67F). Lake trout from the Gull Island S
hoal region, Lake Superior, were double-tagged, and subsequent recaptu
res were monitored in annual surveys conducted from 1974 to 1992. We m
odeled tag-shedding rates, using time at liberty and probabilities of
tag shedding estimated from fish released in 1974 and 1978-1983 and la
ter recaptured. Long-term shedding of numbered anchor tags in lake tro
ut was best described by a nonlinear model with two parameters: an ins
tantaneous tag-shedding rate and a constant representing the proportio
n of tags that were never shed. Although our estimates of annual shedd
ing rates varied with tag type (0.300 for FD-67, 0.441 for FD-67C, and
0.656 for FD-68BC), differences were not significant. About 36% of ta
gs remained permanently affixed to the fish. Of the numbered tags that
were shed (about 64%), two mechanisms contributed to tag loss: disint
egration and dislodgment. Tags from about 11% of recaptured fish had d
isintegrated, but most tags were dislodged. Unprinted tags were shed a
t a significant but low rate immediately after release, but the long-t
erm, annual shedding rate of these tags was only 0.013. Compared with
unprinted tags, numbered tags dislodged at higher annual rates; we hyp
othesized that this was due to the greater frictional drag associated
with the larger cross-sectional area of numbered tags.