BLIND MULTICENTER EVALUATION OF THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF DNA IMAGE CYTOMETRIC AND MORPHOMETRIC FEATURES IN INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER

Citation
F. Theissig et al., BLIND MULTICENTER EVALUATION OF THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF DNA IMAGE CYTOMETRIC AND MORPHOMETRIC FEATURES IN INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER, Analytical cellular pathology, 10(2), 1996, pp. 85-99
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cell Biology",Pathology
ISSN journal
09218912
Volume
10
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
85 - 99
Database
ISI
SICI code
0921-8912(1996)10:2<85:BMEOTP>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The prognostic value of classical prognosticators in 92 invasive breas t cancers with long follow-up has been compared with a number of DNA-r elated image cytometric features (2c deviation index (2cDI)), Auer (hi stogram) type, 5c exceeding rate (5cER), DNA malignancy grade (MG), an d the morphometrically assessed mitotic activity index (MAI) and mean nuclear area (MNA). The quantitative analyses were carried out without knowledge of the outcome nor of clinicopathological features. The cyt ometric analyses and assessments of MNA were performed on Feulgen stai ned, 4-mu m thick tissue sections in Dresden. The MAI was assessed in Amsterdam. Thereafter, the survival data were matched with the classic al variables, the cytometric features, the MAI and the MNA in univaria te and multivariate analyses, Lymph node status (LN) and tumour stage were significantly different, tumour stage being the strongest discrim inator between survivors and non-survivors (Mantel-Cox value = MC = 30 .7, P < 0.0001). Grade was (just) significant (P = 0.05). The cytometr ic features, the MAI and the MNA were all highly significant prognosti cators. The strongest cytometric feature was the Auer type followed by the 5cER, and the 2cDI, The MNA was also significant. The MAI was the strongest single prognostic factor in this blind analysis (MC = 50.8, P < 0.0001), and the MAI combined with the lymph node status, tumour stage and the cytometric features Auer type and 2cDI was the best mult ivariate combination (MC = 94.0). Separate analyses of the lymph node negative (LN-, n = 39) and positive (LN+, n = 53) groups showed that t he 5cER and MAI were the most important in the LN- and the MAI in the LN+ patients.