An analysis of nine semesters of temperature and precipitation forecas
ts at the State University of New York at Albany has been conducted wi
th the goal of investigating the dependence of forecasting skill on ed
ucation and experience. The results show that forecast skill is largel
y determined by experience. The relative advantage of highly experienc
ed forecasters is secured by virtue of the larger set of cases from wh
ich they may draw upon: given a set of forecast information (e.g., moi
sture, winds and cloud cover), such a forecaster is in a better positi
on to maximize linear consistency between that information and the exp
ected evolution of surface temperature and precipitation (given simila
r conditions, make a similar forecast) than someone with less forecast
ing experience. However, the experienced forecaster also gains substan
tially by recognizing those instances in which these linear relationsh
ips no longer apply and by forecasting accordingly. Such instances can
often be recognized using simple rules. Consequently, there is a rapi
d growth of skill with experience for initially inexperienced forecast
ers; this progression continues through several clearly defined stages
and reflects the forecaster's increased ability to implement these si
mple forecasting strategies. The skill advantage of human forecasters
over numerical guidance continues to diminish and now largely reflects
the human ability to recognize occasional departures from the linear
relationship between forecast information and future observations.