Rw. Moollan et al., SOME COMMENTS ON THE DETERMINATION OF MICROCYSTIN TOXINS IN WATERS BYHIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY, Analyst, 121(2), 1996, pp. 233-238
This paper describes some of the problems that may arise during the an
alysis of microcystin toxins and nodularin using the method described
by Lawton, Edwards and Codd (Analyst, 1994, 119, 1525), Difficulty may
be caused by the appearance of additional peaks in the HPLC chromatog
rams as a result of leaching of material from the C-18 trifunctional (
C-18t) solid-phase extraction cartridges, and co elution of other orga
nic compounds in the water makes it difficult to identify toxins using
their characteristic UV spectra, expecially at low toxin concentratio
ns. Samples containing chlorine must be treated with sodium thiosulfat
e since the presence of chlorine results in low toxin recoveries, espe
cially of nodularin, The published method specifies the use of sodium
sulfite and acidification with trifluoroacetic acid for the removal of
chlorine, but application of this procedure has been shown to produce
inconsistent toxin recoveries, and zero percentage recoveries were re
corded in 71% of the analyses performed with treated waters having a m
icrocystin LR concentration of 0.4 mu g l(-1), The use of microcystin
LR as an 'internal standard' to adjust the recovery of other microcyst
in toxins is at best qualitative.