ABNORMALITIES OF THE BALANCE BETWEEN INHIBITION AND EXCITATION IN THE, MOTOR CORTEX OF PATIENTS WITH CORTICAL MYOCLONUS

Citation
P. Brown et al., ABNORMALITIES OF THE BALANCE BETWEEN INHIBITION AND EXCITATION IN THE, MOTOR CORTEX OF PATIENTS WITH CORTICAL MYOCLONUS, Brain, 119, 1996, pp. 309-317
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Clinical Neurology
Journal title
BrainACNP
ISSN journal
00068950
Volume
119
Year of publication
1996
Part
1
Pages
309 - 317
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8950(1996)119:<309:AOTBBI>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Patients with cortical myoclonus may have purely focal or multifocal j erks, or they may have additional bilateral or generalized jerks, sugg esting the spread of excitatory myoclonic activity between the cerebra l hemispheres and across the sensorimotor cortex. The factors contribu ting to this spread of activity were investigated in 10 patients with multifocal cortical myoclonus and eight patients with multifocal and b ilateral or generalized cortical myoclonus. The two groups were termed 'non-spreaders' and 'spreaders', respectively. Eight of the patients were also epileptic. Motor thresholds to single transcranial magnetic shocks at rest were higher in 'non-spreaders' (median 88%, range 45-10 0% of stimulator output) than either 'spreaders' (50%, range 26-90%, P = 0.0231 or healthy controls (38%, range 28-53%, P < 0.001). This pat hological elevation in motor threshold was not simply an effect of tre atment with antiepileptic drugs. Paired transcranial magnetic stimuli were used to investigate ipsilateral cortico-cortical and transcallosa l inhibition. There was less (MANOVA, P < 0.05) ipsilateral inhibition at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1-6 ms in 'spreaders' (mean 107/-SEM 23% of control) compared with 'non-spreaders' (75+/-15%) or heal thy subjects (59+/-10%1. There was also less (P < 0.05) transcallosal inhibition across inhibitory timings (10, 12 and 14 ms) in the 'spread ers' (98+/-6% of control) compared with the 'non-spreaders' (64+/-8%) or healthy subjects (59+/-6%). There was no relationship between ipsil ateral cortico-cortical and transcallosal inhibition and the presence or absence of epilepsy, although non-epileptic patients did have highe r motor thresholds (median 85%, range 32-100% of stimulator output) th an either epileptic patients (50%, range 26-90%, P < 0.001) or healthy controls (38%, range 28-53%, P = 0.002). Abnormalities in ipsilateral and transcallosal inhibition appear to facilitate the spread of the c ortical myoclonic activity responsible for bilateral and generalized j erks. However these abnormalities in inhibition do not play a major ro le in the development of generalized seizures in patients with cortica l myoclonus.