I. Effendy et al., DIFFERENTIAL IRRITANT SKIN-RESPONSES TO TOPICAL RETINOIC ACID AND SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE - ALONE AND IN CROSSOVER DESIGN, British journal of dermatology, 134(3), 1996, pp. 424-430
Topically applied all-trans retinoic acid (RA) is often associated wit
h skin irritation, A detailed quantification of RA-induced functional
changes in stratum corneum is, however, still limited. Using non-invas
ive bioengineering techniques of measurements of transepidermal water
loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration and cutaneous blood flaw (CBF),
we quantified the irritant effects of 0.05% and 0.1% RA in ethanol on
normal skin compared with 1% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) in water as
a model irritant in a 24-h seclusive patch-test assay. Additionally,
in order to document data possibly related to the mechanism of action,
skin responses to both compounds applied in tandem was also investiga
ted over 18 days. The extent of the irritant response to 0.05 and 0.1%
RA, respectively, were similar, implying analogous irritation potency
, While RA caused more intense scaling than SLS, other skin responses
to RA were significantly weaker than those due to SLS, An increase in
TEWL, on day 7, in RA-exposed sites indicates a secondary delayed impa
irment of the stratum corneum (SC) barrier. In a tandem-design assay,
pretreatment with RA appeared to reduce the irritant effects of SLS on
SC hydration and CBF, In contrast, pre-exposure to SLS showed a syner
gestic response in erythema, scaling and TEWL. Our results demonstrate
that RA, like SLS, is capable of impairing SC water barrier function,
which may be responsible, in part, for the irritation associated with
its topical use, However, the distinctive biological responses to the
se compounds suggest a different mode of action of RA and SLS, In addi
tion, the precise reason for the unique results observed in the tandem
-design assays is not clear.