To facilitate the systematic description of catatonic signs, we develo
ped a catatonia rating examination, rating scale and screening instrum
ent. We constructed a 23-item rating scale and a truncated 14-item scr
eening instrument using operationalized definitions of signs ascribed
to catatonia in published sources. Inter-rater reliability was tested
in 44 simultaneous ratings of 28 cases defined by the presence of grea
ter than or equal to 2 signs on the 14-item screen. Inter-rater reliab
ility for total score on the rating scale was 0.93, and mean agreement
of items was 88.2% (SD 9.9). Inter-rater reliability for total score
on the screening instrument was 0.95, and mean agreement of items was
92.7% (SD 4.9). Diagnostic agreement was high based on criteria for ca
tatonia put forth by other authors. Seven per cent (15/215) of consecu
tively admitted patients to an academic psychiatric in-patient facilit
y met criteria for catatonia. It is concluded that catatonia is a dist
inct, moderately prevalent neuropsychiatric syndrome. The rating scale
and screening instrument are reliable and valid. Their use facilitate
s diagnosis, treatment protocols, and cross-study comparisons.