Case material and retrospective studies support the use of both loraze
pam and ECT in treating catatonia, but few prospective investigations
exist and none employ quantitative monitoring of response. In this stu
dy we test their efficacy in an open, prospective protocol, and define
a 'lorazepam test' with predictive value for treatment. Twenty-eight
patients with catatonia were treated systematically with parenteral an
d/or oral lorazepam for up to 5 days, and with ECT if lorazepam failed
. Outcome was monitored quantitatively during the treatment phase with
the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). In 16 of 21 patients
(76%) who received a complete trial of lorazepam (11 with initial int
ravenous challenge), catatonic signs resolved. A positive response to
an initial parenteral challenge predicted final lorazepam response, as
did length of catatonic symptoms prior to treatment. Neither demograp
hic variables nor severity of catatonia predicted response to lorazepa
m. Four patients failing lorazepam responded promptly to ECT. It is co
ncluded that lorazepam and ECT are effective treatments for catatonia.
The rating scale has predictive value and displays sensitivity to cha
nge in clinical status.