LINKING DATA FROM NATIONAL TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION REGISTRIES

Citation
Ws. Copes et al., LINKING DATA FROM NATIONAL TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION REGISTRIES, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 40(3), 1996, pp. 428-436
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Volume
40
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
428 - 436
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of retrospectively creating a d ata base useful in trauma systems evaluations. Materials and Methods: Records for 375 patients in both the Major Trauma Outcome Study and th e Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation were linked to create an injury-through-rehabilitation data base, including patients from f our impairment groups: traumatic brain injury (TBI); spinal cord injur y-paraplegic complete (SCI-PARA) and quadriplegic complete (SCI-QUAD); and hip fracture ((HIP-FX). Measurements and Blain Results: The avera ge ages (25.1 years SCI-QUAD, 72.6 years HIP-PX); Injury Severity Scor e (10.2 HIP-FX, 31.7 SCI-PARA); Revised Trauma Score (5.9 TBI, 7.8 HIP -FX); and acute care lengths of stay (13.3 days HIP-FX, 24.2 days TBI) varied substantially over the four groups, On average, patients spent from approximately 20 days (HIP-FX) to nearly 100 days (SCI-QUAD) in rehabilitation, Functional gains during rehabilitation were primarily in motor skills, but TBI patients also made substantial cognitive gain s, Nearly 90% of TBI and SCI patients were discharged to their homes; the percentage of HIP-FX patients discharged to their homes, however, was lower (74%), Across all impairment groups, more patients lived wit h their relatives after rather than before injury, The correlation bet ween a summary Major Trauma Outcome Study-Functional Independence Meas ure assessed at acute rare discharge and the complete Uniform Data Sys tem for medical Rehabilitation-Functional Independence Measure assesse d on admission to rehabilitation was significant for all study patient s and for each impairment group except SCT-PARA. Conclusions: Linking records to create the study data base was arduous and could not be pra ctically accomplished on a large scale or on a continuing basis, Becau se of the growing emphases on trauma system evaluations and outcomes b eyond survival at acute care discharge, we recommend the routine inclu sion of rehabilitation data in hospital-based trauma registries.