In. Olver et al., AN OPEN MULTICENTER STUDY OF TROPISETRON FOR CISPLATIN-INDUCED NAUSEAAND VOMITING, Medical journal of Australia, 164(6), 1996, pp. 337-340
Objectives: (i) To assess the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron
when used for acute and delayed cisplatin-induced emesis. (ii) To inv
estigate whether dexamethasone added to tropisetron improves the contr
ol of emesis for patients who do not achieve a complete response to tr
opisetron alone, (iii) To assess sex of the patient and alcohol intake
as prognostic factors for nausea and vomiting. Design: A prospective
open label phase II trial over one or two cycles of chemotherapy Data
collection was based on observed response and patients' self-reporting
. Setting: Twenty Australian tertiary care hospitals in 1994. Patients
: 102 male and female patients from 18 to 75 years with histologically
confirmed malignancy receiving their first chemotherapy containing gr
eater than or equal to 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Intervention: In Cycle 1
tropisetron 5 mg was given intravenously before chemotherapy on Day 1,
then 5 mg orally before breakfast on Days 2 to 6. In Cycle 2, dexamet
hasone 20 mg intravenously on Day 1, then 8 mg orally on Days 2 to 6 c
ould be added to tropisetron if a complete antiemetic response had not
been achieved in Cycle 1. Main outcome measures: Number of vomiting e
pisodes and severity of nausea for 6 days after chemotherapy; severity
of side effects; patient satisfaction with chemotherapy treatment; oe
stradiol levels in women; and past alcohol consumption in men and wome
n. Results: (i) The complete response rate (CR) for acute emesis in Cy
cle 1 was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54%-72%), with 84% (95% C
I, 76%-90%) having less than or equal to 2 vomits. The CR for delayed
emesis was 24% (95% CI, 17%-32%). The CR for acute nausea was 56% (95%
CI: 47%-66%), with 97% (95% CI, 91%-99%) having less than or equal to
2 nausea episodes. The CR for delayed nausea was 21% (95% CI, 14%-30%
). Seventy-one patients received Cycle 2. The main side effects were h
eadache (20 patients) and constipation (16 patients). The control of a
cute emesis was rated as ''good'' or ''very good'' by 68% of investiga
tors; 85% rated the tolerability of treatment as ''good'' or ''very go
od''. Treatment was rated as ''very satisfactory'' or ''satisfactory''
by 52% of patients. (ii) The CR for acute emesis with dexamethasone a
dded was 78% (95% CI, 64%-88%). (iii) Women with lower oestradiol leve
ls had better control of emesis, although this difference was not stat
istically significant. Chronic alcohol intake and binge drinking were
strongly associated with a complete acute antiemetic response. Conclus
ions: Tropisetron was effective for acute cisplatin-induced emesis; ad
ding dexamethasone enhanced this response. Both single and combined th
erapy had less effect on delayed emesis. The impact of alcohol on cont
rol of emesis is a chronic rather than acute phenomenon which requires
prospective testing.