Cs. Carter et al., RISPERIDONE USE IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL DURING ITS FIRST YEAR AFTER MARKET APPROVAL - ECONOMIC AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS, Psychopharmacology bulletin, 31(4), 1995, pp. 719-725
Risperidone, a new antipsychotic drug, was recently approved by the Fo
od and Drug Administration (FDA) on the basis of its having comparable
efficacy and less toxicity than haloperidol. In a preliminary study t
o evaluate the therapeutic efficiency of this drug, we conducted a sur
vey of risperidone utilization, cost, and safety during its first year
of availability at an academic psychiatric hospital. Data were obtain
ed from a computerized, centralized medical record system, from an adv
erse drug reaction monitoring system, and from pharmacy purchasing rec
ords. In Its first year of availability, risperidone became the second
most widely used antipsychotic agent at our institution. Most of this
use extended beyond the adult schizophrenia population, for whom pre-
marketing safety and efficacy data are available. The direct instituti
onal cost of risperidone treatment exceeded the entire budget for anti
psychotic drugs during the year before its release. Results from the a
dverse drug reaction reporting system did not indicate a strong advant
age of risperidone over more established antipsychotic agents with res
pect to extrapyramidal side effects. Furthermore, the mean dose of ris
peridone associated with extrapyramidal symptoms was 3.5 mg/day, consi
derably lower than that suggested by pre-marketing studies in a more s
elect patient group. These results confirm that new pharmacological ag
ents are generally used in much broader patient populations than those
for which efficacy and safety have been established prior to FDA appr
oval. This study also raises questions about the therapeutic efficienc
y of risperidone compared with other antipsychotic drugs. We conclude
that systematic studies of outcome, safety, and cost of new pharmaceut
icals in naturalistic settings are needed to provide the data necessar
y to establish local standards of cost-effective care.