The primary focus of this article is on the wartime (1939-1945) necess
ity of the British Army intervening into the personal lives of soldier
s in order to maximise military effectiveness. Analysis of administrat
ive discourse on masculinity suggests that the Army was only too well
aware of the fact that men approximated the exemplary masculinity of t
he combat soldier to greatly varying degrees and that, in practice the
Army worked not only to achieve a division of labour among servicemen
which reflected a range of military masculinities, but also to find a
means of dealing with the fears and anxieties of all men which often
centred on death or marital infidelity. It suggests that the necessity
of such state intervention into the private lives of soldiers was con
tingent on men's emotional investment in the both the gender order and
the particular relations of trust which bound them to it.