CORRELATION BETWEEN LEWIS ACID-BASE SURFACE INTERACTION COMPONENTS AND LINEAR SOLVATION ENERGY RELATIONSHIP SOLVATOCHROMIC ALPHA-PARAMETER AND BETA-PARAMETER
Lh. Lee, CORRELATION BETWEEN LEWIS ACID-BASE SURFACE INTERACTION COMPONENTS AND LINEAR SOLVATION ENERGY RELATIONSHIP SOLVATOCHROMIC ALPHA-PARAMETER AND BETA-PARAMETER, Langmuir, 12(6), 1996, pp. 1681-1687
In this paper, we report our unexpected finding about the correlation
between Lewis acid-base surface interaction components and linear solv
ation energy relationship (LSER) solvatochromic parameters alpha and b
eta. In 1987, van Oss, Chaudhury, and Good proposed to split the asymm
etric acid-base parts of a bipolar system into separate surface tensio
n components: Lewis acid (electron acceptor) gamma(+) and Lewis base (
electron donor) gamma(-). It was assumed that the ratio of gamma(+) an
d gamma(-) for water at 20 degrees C was to be 1.0. With that ratio as
a reference, the base components, gamma(-) for other liquids, biopoly
mers, polymers, and solids appeared to be overestimated. Recently, we
unexpectedly found a correlation for liquids between gamma(+) and gamm
a(-), and a (solvent hydrogen-bond-donating ability) and beta (solvent
hydrogen-bond-accepting ability) introduced since 1976 by Taft and Ka
mlet. From that correlation, we obtained a more realistic ratio for th
e normalized alpha and beta values for water at ambient temperature to
be 1.8 instead of 1.0. Based on this new ratio, we calculated total s
urface tensions for related materials at 20 degrees C. They are genera
lly unchanged as expected, despite the considerable, favorable change
in the gamma(+) and gamma(-) values in the direction of lowering the L
ewis basicity. The predicability of solubility with interfacial tensio
n is also unaffected. For example, the sign of those negative interfac
ial tensions that favor solubility remains the same. In addition, the
implications of other LSER parameters, e.g. Pi and delta(H)(2), on su
rface properties will be briefly mentioned.