USE OF THE FLARE-UP PROTOCOL WITH HIGH-DOSE HUMAN FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE AND HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPINS FOR IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION IN POOR RESPONDERS
Sl. Padilla et al., USE OF THE FLARE-UP PROTOCOL WITH HIGH-DOSE HUMAN FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE AND HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPINS FOR IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION IN POOR RESPONDERS, Fertility and sterility, 65(4), 1996, pp. 796-799
Objective: To analyze the effect of high dose human FSH in combination
with hMG with a flare-up leuprolide acetate (LA) protocol in patients
undergoing IVF at risk for a poor response. Design: Prospective. Sett
ing: Free-standing ambulatory IVF center. Patients: Two hundred eighty
-four patients underwent a LA screening test for IVF. Patients with a
lack of flare response were considered at risk for a poor response and
underwent ovarian stimulation with the flare-up LA protocol in combin
ation with high dose human FSH and hMG. Results: The poor responder gr
oup was compared with the good responders on the flare-up LA protocol
and to patients undergoing ovulation induction with a luteal phase LA
protocol. There were 53 poor responder flare-up LA cycles, 177 good re
sponder flare-up LA cycles, and 54 luteal phase LA cycles. The cancell
ation rate was higher in poor flare-up LA responders (11.3%) compared
with good flare-up LA responders (1.1%) and luteal phase LA cycles (1.
8%). Peak E(2) levels, number of oocytes, and number of embryos were s
ignificantly higher in the good flare-up LA responders. Fertilization
rate was similar in all groups. Ongoing pregnancy rate per retrieval w
as 28% in good responders, 29% in poor responders, and 33% in luteal p
hase LA patients. Only one patient (0.4%) was hospitalized for severe
ovarian hyperstimulation. Conclusion: The flare-up protocol with high-
dose human FSH and hMG is a very good alternative for patients who are
at high risk for a poor response. Although peak E(2) and number of oo
cytes were significantly lower in this group, the patients who respond
ed had the same fertilization and pregnancy rate as the good responder
s. Cancellation rate remains high in poor responders.