Jkc. Chan et al., FOLLICULAR DENDRITIC CELL-SARCOMA - CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF 17 CASES SUGGESTING A MALIGNANT POTENTIAL HIGHER THAN CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED, Cancer, 79(2), 1997, pp. 294-313
BACKGROUND. The goal of this study was to characterize the clinicopath
ologic features of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, a very uncommon
neoplasm. METHODS. The 17 cases were collected from the consultation a
nd surgical pathology files of the authors, including 8 previously rep
orted cases. The histologic and immunohistochemical features and outco
me were analyzed. RESULTS. The patients had a median age of 40 years,
with a slight female predominance. Seven patients presented with enlar
ged lymph nodes, and ten presented with tumor in extranodal sites. Two
cases were associated with hyaline-vascular Castleman's disease. The
tumors had an average greatest dimension of 6.7 cm. The most common hi
stologic feature was a storiform or fascicular array of spindle, ovoid
, or polygonal cells with Oval nuclei, delicate nuclear membrane, vesi
cular or granular chromatin, distinct nucleoli, indistinct cell border
s, and frequently fibrillary cytoplasm. There were often scattered mul
tinucleated forms. The tumor cells sometimes formed sheets, circular w
horls, follicle-like structures, trabeculae, or pseudovascular spaces.
There was a sprinkling of small lymphocytes, with or without cuffing
around blood vessels. The neoplastic cells were immunoreactive for CD2
1 (17 of 17 cases), CD35 (17 of 17 cases), desmoplakin (10 of 17 cases
), epithelial membrane antigen (14 of 16 cases), S-100 protein (6 of 1
7 cases), and CD68 (2 of 17 cases), but not cytokeratin. Ultrastructur
al studies showed villous processes connected by desmosomes. Only one
harbored the Epstein-Barr virus. Among 13 patients with a median follo
w-up of 3 years, local recurrence occurred in 6, metastasis in 6, and
3 died of disease. CONCLUSIONS. Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma exhi
bits distinctive histologic features that permit its presumptive recog
nition, but a firm diagnosis requires confirmation with special studie
s. Because it has a significant recurrent and metastatic potential (th
e latter risk having been previously underestimated), it should be vie
wed as an intermediate grade malignancy. An intraabdominal location is
associated with a particularly aggressive clinical course. (C) 1997 A
merican Cancer Society.